Forum Press is a space for debate and bold ideas.
Liberal Bullies argues that the political left has an urgent and rising problem with authoritarianism. We must, argues Conway, stand up to progressives and defend our basic democratic values.
Brahmins examines the rise of the radical rich and why a new plutocratic elite caste that worships wealth and success has adopted ultra-progressive social justice activism. It argues that their embrace of a politics of radical freedom and autonomy entrenches their own privileges and thereby neo-feudal economic inequality.
From Notre Dame professor and author of Why Liberalism Failed comes a provocative call for replacing the tyranny of the self-serving liberal elite with conservative leaders aligned with the interests of the working class
The Paradox of Debt argues that, while debt – private and public – is essential to our economy, it also tends to create instability and crisis. A deep-dive analysis of the nation’s entire balance sheet allows us to see how the dynamic force of debt can be managed to maintain both growth and stability.
Why the Left is out of touch with the faith-based pro-family patriotism of Britain’s ethnic minorities
In this trenchant polemic, Mary Harrington argues that feminists should be more sceptical about progress.
Why conservatism needs to rediscover its Anglo-American roots in empiricism, faith and patriotism to flourish
I’m delighted to say here at Forum we’ve signed the brilliant Gareth Roberts to address these tensions. His new book – provisionally entitled Gay Shame: The Rise of Gender Ideology and the New Homophobia – promises not only to be a hard-hitting look at a very important issue, but also a book laced with his characteristic wit and humour.
I am delighted to announce another acquisition by Forum Press: Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won’t Even Save the Planet) by Ross Clark. I will concede that when a book against Net Zero – the legally binding government target to reduce the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions to Net Zero by 2050 – was proposed to me, I was a little wary. There comes a point when one wonders whether one has the energy to court controversy on yet another subject, particularly one that has increasingly become a taboo area.
